能否跳出“现代”的掌心--高瑞泉先生《新文化运动与中国哲学的现代开展》引义  

Can We Flee the Grip of "Modernity" ?A Dialogue with Prof. Gao Ruiquan's "The New Culture Movement and the Modern Unfolding of Chinese Philosophy"

作　　者：刘梁剑[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学哲学系 [2]华东师范大学中国现代思想文化研究所,研究员上海200241

出　　处：《探索与争鸣》2018年第4期81-86,共6页Exploration and Free Views

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“‘汉语言哲学’视域下中国哲学话语创建的理论与实践”(17BZX059)

摘　　要：中国哲学的当代开展离不开新的"文化生发期"。当下中国思想"应该"处于新的"文化生发期",一个不同于新文化运动时期的"文化生发期",一个跳出"现代"的掌心的"当代"。世界历史的尺度构成了"当代性"的一个重要面向。世界性百家争鸣的新"文化生发期",必然要求突破单一文明框架内部的现代叙事。新的"文化生发期"必须面对后人类状况,因为人类整体正面临着一种前所未有的危机。中国哲学的当代开展有必要注意到现代汉语的未尽人意之处,自觉直面现代汉语哲学语汇的困境并谋取克服之方。The contemporary unfolding of Chinese philosophy is inseparable from the new "phase of cultural emergence". Today, Chinese thought "should" be in a new "phase of cultural emergence", a "phase of cultural emergence" that differs from the phase of the New Culture Movement, a "contemporary age" that flees the grip of modernity. The world history constitutes an important dimension of what is contemporary. The new "phase of cultural emergence" through the contending of the hundred schools on the global scale demands breaking the modern narrative inside the framework of a single civilization. The new "phase of cultural emergence" must face the posthuman condition, because the whole of humanity currently faces an unprecedented crisis. The contemporary unfolding of Chinese philosophy needs to focus on the unsatisfactory aspects of the modern Chinese language, and self-consciously face the predicament of the modern Chinese philosophical vocabulary and plot out methods for overcoming them.

关 键 词：文化生发期 中国哲学 世界性百家争鸣 后人类 现代汉语 

分 类 号：B26[哲学宗教—中国哲学] K203[历史地理—历史学]