检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:穆云红[1] Mu Yunhong(The Open University of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao 066001, Chin)
出 处:《黑河学院学报》2018年第4期15-16,共2页Journal of Heihe University
摘 要:2015年行政诉讼法的修改结果基本符合司法领域的预期,相对于1990年的行政诉讼法有相当大的突破。然而,新法修改也存在着诸多不成熟的地方,在行政法领域遗留了一些问题,有待进一步解决。对此,结合行政诉讼实践情况,分析行政法领域尚待解决的遗留问题,并提出建议,为行政诉讼法的再度完善提供有价值的参考。The revision result of the administrative procedure law in 2015 is basically in line with the expectation of the judicial field, having made a considerable breakthrough compared with the administrative procedural law in 1990. However, there still exist many immature areas in the revision of new law and some leftover problems in the field of administrative law, which needs to be solved further. In this regard, based on the practice of administrative litigation, this paper analyzes the remaining problems in the field of administrative law and puts forward some suggestions to provide valuable reference for the improvement of administrative procedure law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43