检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李杰[1] 王晓民[2] Li Jie1, Wang Xiaomin2(1. School of Health Management and Education, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China; 2. Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, Chin)
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学卫生管理与教育学院,北京100069 [2]首都医科大学,北京100069
出 处:《医学教育管理》2018年第2期168-172,共5页Medical Education Management
摘 要:本文通过对比分析我国医科大学科研竞争力评价指标体系,发现目前我国医科大学科研竞争力评价体系大多与综合性大学类似,不足以体现医科大学特色。通过文献研究和德尔菲法,构建出一套体现医科大学特色、可操作性强的我国医科大学科研竞争力评价指标体系,并通过公共数据采集方式对照评价指标体系就我国15所医科大学科研竞争力进行评价,从主观和客观两个方面进行实证分析。Through sorting out the evaluation index system of scientific research competitiveness of medical universities in China, this paper showed that most evaluation index systems of medical universities were similar to those of comprehensive universities, which is insufficient to reflect the characteristics of medical universities. Through literature research and Delphi expert consultation, this paper set up a set of operable evaluation index system reflecting the characteristics of medical universities in China, and collected index data for empirical analysis both subjectively and objectively.
分 类 号:G644[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.166.40