检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王静[1] 陈永香[1] 黄杰[1] WANG Jing;CHEN Yongxiang;HUANG Jie.(Department of Pediatrics,Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210003, CHINA)
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学第二附属医院儿科,江苏省210003
出 处:《江苏医药》2018年第4期413-415,共3页Jiangsu Medical Journal
摘 要:目的比较左乙拉西坦(LEV)与丙戊酸钠(VPA)治疗伴中央颞区棘波儿童良性癫痫(BECT)的临床疗效。方法选取BECT患儿36例,分为LEV组和VPA组,每组18例,治疗12个月。比较两组临床疗效。结果治疗12个月后,两组总有效率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。LEV组脑电图痫样放电较VPA组减少(P<0.05);LEV组言语智商和总智商得分高于VPA组(P<0.05)。结论 LEV及VPA治疗BECT临床疗效相当;但LEV对患儿的脑电图痫样放电和认知水平改善效果更好。Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of levetiracetam (LEV) and valproate (VPA) in the treatment of children with benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (BECT). Methods The BECT in 36 children was treated with LEV(group LEV, 18 cases) or VPA (group VPA, 18 cases) for 12 months. The clinical efficacy was compared between two groups. Results After treated for 12 months, the overall effectiveness rate of groups of LEV and VPA was similar (94. 4 % vs. 88. 9 %)(P〉0. 05). Compared to group VPA, the decrease of EEG epilepsy-like discharge was more and the scores of verbal intelligence quotient and total intelligence quotient were higher in group VPA (P〈0. 05). Conclusion Both of LEV and VPA have similar clinical efficacy in the treatment of children with BECT. Compared to VPA, LEV is more effective in reducing EEG epilepsylike discharge and improving cognitive function.
分 类 号:R742[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15