Brief Analysis of Ergative Constructions in Mandarin Chinese——From the Perspective of Functional Grammar  

作　　者：刘晓杨[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南大学外语学院

出　　处：《校园英语》2018年第11期223-224,共2页English On Campus

摘　　要：在传统及物性分析的基础上,韩礼得提出了作格分析模式.不同于及物性分析关注过程是否延及其他实体,作格分析从一个新的角度去解释小句,即过程是否由外部原因引起.通过对比分析及物性和作格性,本文总结了作格理论中的主要概念,以及两者间的差异.尽管汉语不是典型的作格语言,但现代汉语中存在大量的作格结构,然而传统的及物性分析不能对这些特殊结构做出恰当的解释.因此,在相关作格理论的基础上,本文从功能语法的角度重点分析了现代汉语中的作格结构.Basing on the traditional interpreting mode-transitive analysis, Halliday put forward the ergative analysis. Different from transitive analysis which focuses on the extension, ergative analysis interprets the meaning of clause from a new perspective whether there’s an outer causation in the process . Through contrast analysis between transitivity and ergativity, this paper provides main concepts of ergativity theories and differences between them. Though Chinese is not considered as a typical “ergative language”, there are lots of ergative constructions in mandarin Chinese which cannot be explained properly by transitive analysis mode. Therefore, basing on certain ergativity theories, this paper mainly focus on analyzing those ergative constructions in mandarin Chinese from the perspective of functional grammar.

关 键 词：作格 及物性 作格分析 作格结构 现代汉语 

分 类 号：H319[语言文字—英语]