检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘治强[1] LIU Zhiqiang(Department of Stomatology, The Afliated Hospital of Guilin Medical College, Guilin Guangxi 541001, China)
机构地区:[1]桂林医学院附属医院口腔科,广西桂林541001
出 处:《中国继续医学教育》2018年第15期90-92,共3页China Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的分析微创拔牙用于下颌智齿拔除中的临床效果。方法选取我院2009年8月—2017年8月择期行下颌智齿拔除患者108例作为研究对象。将选择凿骨劈冠拔牙手术作为对照组,将选择微创拔牙术作为观察组,比较两组临床效果。结果观察组张口受限程度优于对照组,两组数据对比,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察患者的VAS评分低于对照组,两组数据对比,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组并发症总发生12例,观察组并发症总发生5例,两组数据对比,差异显著具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论针对下颌智齿采用微创拔牙手术可有效减少术后张口受限程度,带给患者更低的术后疼痛,临床效果明显。Objective To analyze the clinical efect of minimally invasive extraction in the extraction of mandibular wisdom teeth. Methods 108 cases of mandibular wisdom tooth extraction in our hospital from August 2009 to August 2017 were selected as the research objects. The chisel split crowns were selected as the control group. The minimally invasive extraction was selected as the observation group, and the clinical efects of the two groups were compared. Results The degree of mouth opening limitation in the observation group was better than that in the control group. The diference between the two groups was statistically signifcant (P 〈 0.05). The VAS score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group. The diference between the two groups was statistically signifcant (P 〈 0.05). There were 12 cases of complications in the control group and 5 cases in the observation group. The diference between the two groups was statistically signifcant (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion Minimally invasive tooth extraction for mandibular wisdom teeth can effectively reduce postoperative degree of mouth opening and bring lower postoperative pain.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145