检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李慧 庄跃宏 彭小伟 李赞 周晓 宋达疆 周波 吕春柳 欧延 彭文 LI Hui;ZHUANG Yue-hong;PENG Xiao-wei;LI Zan;ZHOU Xiao;SONG Da-jiang;ZHOU Bo;LYU Chun-liu;OU Yan;PENG Wen(Department of Oncology Plastic Surgery/Head and Neck Surgery, Hunan Cancer Hospital, the Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xiangya Medical School, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China;Department of Human Anatomy, His- tology and Embryology, School of Basic Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350100, China)
机构地区:[1]湖南省肿瘤医院中南大学湘雅医学院附属肿瘤医院肿瘤整形/头颈外科,湖南长沙410013 [2]福建医科大学基础医学院人体解剖与组织胚胎学系,福建福州350100
出 处:《中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志》2018年第2期119-122,共4页Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-skull Base Surgery
基 金:湖南省自然科学基金(2016JJ6089)
摘 要:目的试图探索定位面神经主干的新方法,指导腮腺手术中面神经的解剖与保护。方法通过冰冻尸体解剖及临床研究,测量面神经主干与下颌骨后缘及周围解剖标志点的解剖学关系。将临床病例分为实验组和对照组,分别通过不同的面神经定位方法对面神经进行解剖,比较两组之间在手术时间和出血量的差异。结果尸体解剖与临床研究测量AO距离(t=1.114,P=0.272)和α角(t=1.416,P=0.165)之间差异无统计学意义。临床研究的实验组与对照组在手术时间方面分别为(10.4±5.3)min和(23.0±6.7)min,出血量分别为(11.0±3.5)ml和(45.5±6.4)ml;两组之间差异具有统计学意义(P=0.000)。结论本研究得到的定位面神经主干的新方法,有利于安全、快速地解剖面神经主干,对于临床手术具有重要的意义。Objective To explore a novel approach for identification of the facial nerve trunk so as to guild the dissection and protection of the facial nerve in parotidectomy. Methods Through anatomical and clinical investigations,the anatomical relationships among the intersection of facial nerve trunk and the posterior margin of the mandible and surrounding anatomical points were measured. In the clinical investigation,the patients were randomly divided into experimental group and control group. The facial nerve trunk was identified with different approaches respectively in the two groups. The operation time and bleeding volume in both groups were recorded and analyzed statistically. Results The differences of the data(AO distance and αangle) obtained anatomically and intraoperatively were statistically insignificant(both P 0.05). The operation time and bleeding volume of the experimental group were 10.4 ± 5.3 min and 11.0 ± 3.5 ml,respectively. And those of the control group were 23.0 ± 6.7 min and 45.5 ± 6.4 ml. Their differences between the two groups were statistically significant(P = 0.000). Conclusion In favor of safe and prompt dissection of facial nerve trunk,the novel approach we proposed is of great importance for the parotid surgery.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.135.190.40