检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵彩霞[1] 马丽莉[1] 王娟 ZHAO Caixia;MA Lili;WANG Juan(Department of Pathology,Changzhi Medical College,Changzhi 046000,Shanxi,China;Department of Digestive System,Peace Hospital of Changzhi Medical College,Changzhi 046000,Shanxi,China)
机构地区:[1]长治医学院病理学教研室长治医学院科技创新团队,山西长治046000 [2]长治医学院附属和平医院消化内科,山西长治046000
出 处:《贵州医科大学学报》2018年第5期613-616,620,共5页Journal of Guizhou Medical University
基 金:长治医学院科技启动基金项目(QDZ201505)
摘 要:目的:探讨血清胰岛素样生长因子结合蛋白2(IGFBP-2)联合糖链抗原72-4(CA72-4)检测对胃癌的诊断价值。方法:62例胃癌患者作为胃癌组,30例良性胃病患者作为良性胃部疾病组,40例正常体检者作为对照组,采用酶联免疫吸附法测定受试者血清IGFBP-2、CA72-4水平,放射免疫法测定受试者血清胰岛素样生长因子-1(IGF-1)、IGF-2水平,Pearson法分析胃癌患者血清IGFBP-2、CA72-4与IGF-1、IGF-2的相关性;应用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)分析IGFBP-2、CA72-4对胃癌诊断的灵敏度和特异度。结果:胃癌组患者血清IGFBP-2、CA72-4、IGF-1及IGF-2水平显著高于良性胃部疾病组和对照组(P<0.05),且血清IGFBP-2水平分别与CA72-4、IGF-1及IGF-2水平呈正相关(r=0.849、0.603、0.711,P<0.05),血清CA72-4水平分别与IGF-1及IGF-2水平呈正相关(r=0.611、0.694,P<0.05);CA72-4早期诊断胃癌的敏感度最高(91.3%),IGFBP-2的特异度最高(92.6%);IGFBP-2截断值(579.74)高于CA72-4(17.83),CA72-4联合IGFBP-2检测胃癌的AUC=0.89,优于单一IGFBP-2(AUC=0.73)或CA72-4(AUC=0.65),单一IGFBP-2又优于CA72-4,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:血清IGFBP-2联合CA72-4检测对胃癌的早期诊断优于单一IGFBP-2或CA72-4。Objective: To investigate the diagnostic value of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-2( IGFBP-2) in the detection of gastric cancer. Methods: All the blood serum samples from 62 patients with gastric cancer,30 patients with stomach benign pancreatic diseases and 40 healthy controls were determined by enzyme-linked immuno-sorbent assay( ELISA) and immuno-radiometric analysis( IRMA). The diagnostic values of IGFBP-2 and CA72-4 were analyzed and compared by the receiver operator characteristics( ROC) curve and the area under curve( AUC). Results: The levels of serum IGFBP-2,CA72-4,IGF-1 and IGF-2 in patients with gastric cancer were significantly higher than those in other two groups( P〈0. 01). In the gastric cancer group,the serum level of IGFBP-2 was positively correlated with CA72-4,IGF-1 and IGF2( P〈0. 01). The AUC of IGFBP-2 was larger than that of CA72-4 alone( P〈0. 01); The AUC of combined samples of IGFBP-2 and CA72-4 was larger than that of single IGFBP-2 or CA72-4,and the difference was statistically significant( P〈0. 01).Conclusions: IGFBP-2,IGF-1 and IGF2 may be associated with the growth of gastric cancer. Combined detection of IGFBP-2 and CA72-4 appears to be a suitable indicator of gastric cancer. It can be applied in the diagnosis of gastric cancer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.198