惩戒权之经济罚博弈论研究  

Study on Economic Punishment Game Theory of Punishment Power

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:问清泓[1] wen Qinghong

机构地区:[1]武汉科技大学文法与经济学院,湖北武汉430081

出  处:《决策与信息》2018年第6期80-87,共8页Decision & Information

摘  要:惩戒权之惩戒一般包括经济罚和非经济罚两类。惩戒权之经济罚存在三种相互博弈的理论:一是罚款"肯定说";二是罚款"否定说";三是罚款"替代说"。罚款"肯定说"及"否定说"较为传统。罚款"替代说"介于罚款之肯定与否定之间,是在否定罚款的大前提下,主张将减薪或降薪作为罚款的替代产品。相比较而言,罚款"替代说"比较合理可行,应当成为惩戒权之经济罚的主要内容。Punishment in punishment power generally include economic punishment and non-economic punishment. There are three kinds of game theories of economic punishment in punishment power: the first is the "positive argument" of fines; the second is the "negative argument" of fines; and the third is the "replacement argument" of fines. The "positive argument" and "negative argument" of fines are more traditional. The "replacement argument" of fines is belween the positive and negative arguments of fines, which advocates replacing fines with pay reduction or salary reduction in the major premise of negating fines. In contrast, the "replacement argument" of fines is more reasonable and feasible, and should be the main content of economic punishment in punishment power,

关 键 词:惩戒权 经济罚 罚款“替代说” 劳动法 

分 类 号:D922[政治法律—法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象