检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Rui-lan Cheng
机构地区:[1]Shandong University,China
出 处:《Language and Semiotic Studies》2018年第1期102-124,共23页语言与符号学研究(英文)
摘 要:In order to explore the gaps between decoders' interpretations and encoders' designing intentions with respect to the same multimodal discourses, thirty linguistic and thirty art graphic participants were chosen as decoders and encoders, respectively.The participants were required to interpret the same research data in terms of the best and the worst major colors, as well as the best and the worst synergetic patterns formed by major modes.It was found that the complete unanimity in terms of both color and spatial arrangements among the interpretations between participants only reached 43.3%.The unanimity in the interpretations from the perspective of color alone reached 46.7%.Moreover, the interpretations from the perspective of spatial arrangements present high unanimity, with a rate up to 70%.It is concluded that there are both differences and similarities between the interpretations made by encoders and decoders.The possible reasons underlying both differences and similarities are probed in the present study as well.In order to explore the gaps between decoders' interpretations and encoders' designing intentions with respect to the same multimodal discourses, thirty linguistic and thirty art graphic participants were chosen as decoders and encoders, respectively. The participants were required to interpret the same research data in terms of the best and the worst major colors, as well as the best and the worst synergetic patterns formed by major modes. It was found that the complete unanimity in terms of both color and spatial arrangements among the interpretations between participants only reached 43.3%. The unanimity in the interpretations from the perspective of color alone reached 46.7%. Moreover, the interpretations from the perspective of spatial arrangements present high unanimity, with a rate up to 70%. It is concluded that there are both differences and similarities between the interpretations made by encoders and decoders. The possible reasons underlying both differences and similarities are probed in the present study as well.
关 键 词:ENCODERS DECODERS SIMILARITIES DIFFERENCES multimodal discourses
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222