卫生职称评聘模式探析  

Discussion on health professional title assessment and engagement

作　　者：张凯[1] 陈燕[1] ZHANG Kai;CHENYan(Capital Institute of Pediatrics, No.2, Yabao Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, PRC)

机构地区：[1]首都儿科研究所,北京市朝阳区雅宝路2号100020

出　　处：《中国医院》2018年第6期59-60,共2页Chinese Hospitals

摘　　要：目的:通过评聘分开和评聘结合两种模式的利弊分析,提出采取何种评聘模式的建议。方法:采用利益相关分析,基于现状和问题,剖析优劣。结果:对卫生专业技术人员,评聘分开更有利于促进其职业发展;对医疗卫生机构,两种模式无太大差异;对卫生行政主管部门,针对目前现状,评聘分开更有利于优化人才结构、促进人才流动。结论:现阶段应实行评聘分开模式。Objectives： To propose recommendations on title assessment and engagement mode by comparison analysis of assessment and engagement integration mode and separate mode. Methods： Stakeholder analysis was used to analysis the current situation and problems and the advantages and disadvantages of the 2 modes were compared. Results： Professional title assessment and engagement separate gives more help on career development for health professionals. But it has no significant differences for medical institutes. According to the current situations, health administrator is considered to promote title assessment and engagement separate mode to optimize human resources structure and human resources flow. Conclusions： In current stages, title assessment and engagement separate mode more fits for professional title assessment.

关 键 词：卫生职称 评聘模式 评聘分开 

分 类 号：R192[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]