检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李帅 Li Shuai
机构地区:[1]华东师范大学法学院
出 处:《法学教育研究》2017年第4期226-239,共14页Legal Education Research
摘 要:经济法作为一门新兴学科,本专业经典文献并不多,导致许多经济法学者都转而研读经济学等领域的经典.但因此形成的经济法成果就成了“四不像”,经济学界视其浅薄,理论深度不够;而法学界认为其对规则的研究不足。多为制度稗贩,难以生成经典。在经济法学的研究中,我们要回归法学经典的阅读,通过对法学经典的研读来凝聚经济法研究的共识,从而推动经济法学向前发展。此外,对于外文经典以及经济学经典,应当采用辩证的态度,扬弃的吸收。As a new discipline, economic law has only a few classic literatures, which makes many economic law scholars turn to read classics of economics and other areas. Under this circumstance, economic law results become a mishmash. The research results are too superficial to meet the depth of theories in the field of economics. Because of lacking the rule research and simply being the copy of systems, they are difficult to be the classics in the fields of law. In the study of economic law, we must return to the reading of law classics, and through the reading to unite the consensus of economic law research and to promote the foreign classics and economics viewed dialectically development of classics should economic law. In addition, be absorbed critically and be viewed dialectically.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28