检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:裴煜[1] Pei Yu(Criminal Investigation Dep, Huhei University of Police, Wuhan, Hubei, 430034)
机构地区:[1]湖北警官学院,湖北武汉430034
出 处:《贵州警官职业学院学报》2018年第1期19-26,共8页Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College
基 金:2014年度湖北高等学校优秀中青年科技创新团队计划项目(T201421)
摘 要:刑事强制采样具有快速准确认定作案人、有效缩短案件侦破时间和节约有限侦查资源等优点,在当前案件侦破中应用广泛。因缺乏有效法律规制,侦查实践中部分公安机关运用刑事强制采样措施超越正常边界,侵犯了采样相对人人身自由、身体健康和隐私等基本权利。借鉴现代法治国家成熟做法,明确我国运用刑事强制采样应遵循的基本原则,限定刑事强制采样适用范围,规范刑事强制采样实施程序,完善采样相对人权利救济途径和强化采集样本保管工作。Compulsory criminal sampling has the advantages of rapidly identifying perpetrators, effectively shortening the time of detection, and saving limited investigation resources. Thus it is widely applied in the investigation of criminal cases. Due to the lack of legislation, criminal investigations of compulsory criminal sampling by public security organs may sometimes go beyond the normal boundary to violate the suspect's such rights as freedom, health and privacy. Learning from the practices that are mature in the modern rule of law countries, we should make it clear in our country that basic principles of compulsory criminal sampling be followed, compulsive sampling scope be set, procedure of compulsory criminal sampling be standardize, and rights relief for relative persons sampled and safekeeping of samples be perfected.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145