不同种源油用牡丹园艺性状及种子油脂质量分数  

Horticultural Traits and Oil Content of Seed of Paeonia sufruticosa Andr. for Oil in Different Provenances

作　　者：陈慧玲[1] 杨柳[1] 杨彦伶[1] 张新叶[1] 赵天宇 王文武 Chen Huiling;Yang Liu;Yang Yanling;Zhang Xinye;Zhao Tianyu;Wang Wenwu(Hubei Academy of Forestry, Wuhan 430075, P. R. China;Xiangyang City Fortesty Institute in Hubei Province)

机构地区：[1]湖北省林业科学研究院,武汉430075 [2]湖北省襄阳市林业科学研究所

出　　处：《东北林业大学学报》2018年第5期64-68,共5页Journal of Northeast Forestry University

基　　金：湖北省省级财政油用牡丹产业发展项目(2014-2016)(2130205)

摘　　要：以4个不同种源4年生油用牡丹苗为试验材料,对其园艺学性状和种子的油脂成分进行了分析比较,结果表明:从种苗成活率、开花率和结籽率等方面来看,2号种源安徽‘凤丹’牡丹表现最好,3号种源河南杨山牡丹次之,4号种源蕲春‘凤丹’牡丹最差;从果荚直径、单心皮长度、单心皮种子数等园艺性状来看,1号种源保康杂交牡丹、2号和3号之间无显著性差异,4号显著低于其他种源;4个种源的种子质量无显著性差异,种子产量差异极显著,2号表现优异;4个种源在种子含油率、亚油酸质量分数上表现无显著差异,而不饱和脂肪酸、亚麻酸质量分数上均表现为1~3号无显著性差异,4号质量分数较低;油酸质量分数则表现为4号质量分数显著高于其他3个种源。With four different provenances of 4-a seedlings,we studied their horticultural traits and oil content of seed. Compared with the survival rate of the seedling,flowering rate and seed setting rate of view,No.2 was best,followed by No.3 and No.4. Compared with the diameter of the pod,monocarpellary length,seed number of single carpel horticultural traits,there were no significant difference among No.1、No.2 and No.3,but No. 4 was significantly lower than other provenances. The100-seed weight was no significant difference among the four provenances,there was significant difference in seed yield,and No.2 was with outstanding performance. There were no significant differences between the four performances in seed oil content and the content of linoleic acid. No.4 was lower than other three provenances in unsaturated fatty acids and linolenic acid content,1 and significantly higher than other three provenances in oleic acid content.

关 键 词：油用牡丹 种源 园艺性状 油脂分析 

分 类 号：S794.9[农业科学—林木遗传育种] S722.5[农业科学—林学]