检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王书彩[1] 朱希燕[2] 李琛琮 刘庆利[1] 杜亚强[1] WANG Shu-cai1,ZHU Xi-yan2,LI Chen-cong1,LIU Qing-li1,DU Ya-qiang1(1.Physical Examination Center,Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University,Shijiazhuang 050012,China2 No.5 Department of Chest Surgery,Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University,Shijiazhuang 050012,Chin)
机构地区:[1]河北医科大学第四医院体检部,河北省石家庄市050012 [2]河北医科大学第四医院胸外五科,河北省石家庄市050012
出 处:《中国全科医学》2018年第13期1585-1588,共4页Chinese General Practice
基 金:河北省医学科学研究重点课题计划(20150811)
摘 要:目的评价联合胃泌素17、胃蛋白酶原、14C呼气试验在健康体检人群中胃癌筛查的效果,为健康体检项目的制定提供理论依据。方法选取2016年7—10月河北医科大学第四医院参与胃癌筛查项目的 40岁及以上职工1 186例为研究对象,检测胃泌素17、胃蛋白酶原水平,并行14C呼气试验及无痛胃镜检查。结果胃泌素17、胃蛋白酶原、14C呼气试验及联合筛查的阳性率分别为46.5%(219/471)、42.0%(198/471)、46.8%(206/440)、63.7%(242/380),其中联合筛查的阳性率高于胃泌素17、胃蛋白酶原、14C呼气试验(P<0.008 3)。共130例受试者参与无痛胃镜检查,检出萎缩性胃炎、胃溃疡、胃息肉、癌前病变分别有5、30、29、4例。联合筛查的胃溃疡、胃息肉阳性检出率高于胃泌素17、胃蛋白酶原、14C呼气试验,差异有统计学意义(P<0.008 3)。各筛查项目萎缩性胃炎、胃溃疡、胃息肉、癌前病变的阳性预测值比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论联合胃泌素17、胃蛋白酶原、14C呼气试验能提高胃黏膜病变的阳性检出率,可作为胃癌高危人群的筛查项目。Objective To evaluate the effect of a combination test of gastrin-17(GAS-17) and pepsinogen measurement and 14 C-UBT for gastric cancer screening in physical examination,providing a theoretical basis for the enaction of physical examination items.Methods The enrolled 1 186 participants were employees aged 40 or over from Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University.They underwent a physical examination from July to October,2017.The number of participants undergoing GAS-17 measurement,pepsinogen measurement,14 C-UBT,combination test(GAS-17 and pepsinogen measurement combined with 14 C-UBT) and painless gastroscopy for gastric cancer screening was 471,471,440,380,130,respectively.Results The overall positive prevalence detected by GAS-17 measurement,pepsinogen measurement,14 C-UBT,combination test was 46.5%(219 cases),42.0%(198 cases),46.8%(206 cases),63.7%(242 cases),respectively,demonstrating that the combination test had higher positive rate than the other 3 methods(P0.008 3).Moreover,the prevalence of gastric ulcer or gastric polyps detected by combination test was still higher compared with the other 3 methods(P0.008 3).However,these 4 methods showed similar positive predictive value for atrophic gastritis,gastric ulcer,gastric polyps or gastric precancerous lesions(P〉0.05).By painless gastrosopy,5 were found with atrophic gastritis,30 with gastric ulcer,29 with gastric polyps,and 4 with gastric precancerous lesions.Conclusion The combination test demonstrated higher detection rate of gastric diseases than each of its components alone,so it can be used as a screening item for high risk population for gastric cancer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.166