ON THE EVIDENCE SYSTEM OF LENIENT PUNISHMENT FOR THE ADMISSION OF GUILT AND ACCEPTANCE OF PUNISHMENT  

认罪认罚从宽证据制度研究（英文）

作　　者：郭志远 

机构地区：[1]Anhui University Law School

出　　处：《China Legal Science》2018年第3期4-28,共25页中国法学（英文版）

基　　金：the phased achievement of the National Social Science Fund Major Projects of 2017(17VHJ010);National Social Science Fund Project of 2013(13CFX056)

摘　　要：As a pilot system put forward by the 4th Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee, the system of lenient punishment for admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment is facing quite a few theoretical problems regarding evidence application in practice. The maintenance of the current standard of criminal proof is more favorable for guaranteeing the substantive justice. While the burden of proof is being assigned, the admission of guilt and the acceptance of punishment shall be differentiated, which means no change in the proof for conviction while the criterion of ＂he who asserts mustprove＂ is applicable to the part of sentencing. The defendant＇s voluntariness and authenticity shall be reviewed, and the conviction shah be differentiated from sentencing in terms of the specific criterion for evidence review. The rules of evidence may be in principle lenient and simplified moderately, while contradictory problems between the principle of directness and verbalism, rules of defective evidence correction, the voluntary confession rule and lenient punishment for admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment, need further exploration.实践中认罪认罚从宽制度在具体适用上尤其是在证据制度方面存在许多可探讨的理论问题。在证明标准方面,保持现有的刑事证明标准将更利于保障实体公正;在证明责任方面,须将认罪与认罚进行区分考量;在证据审查方面,着重审查被告人认罪自愿性和真实性;在证据规则方面,原则上应当允许适度从宽从简适用,在具体证据规则适用上还存在理论上的矛盾,还需进一步探讨。

关 键 词：被告人认罪 制度研究 证据制度 刑事证明标准 证据审查 证据规则 具体适用 实体公正 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]