食品监管渎职罪的本体结构与认定  

On the Structure of Malfeasance Crime of Food Supervision from the Perspective of Supervision Negligence and the Way of Its Confirmation

作　　者：肖扬宇 翟辉 Xiao Yang - yu;Zhai Hui(School of Law and Intellectual Property, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou 510450, China;Bureau of Legal Affairs, Guangdong Public Security Department, Guangzhou 510050, China)

机构地区：[1]广东技术师范学院法学与知识产权学院,广东广州510450 [2]广东省公安厅法制总队,广东广州510050

出　　处：《政法学刊》2018年第2期66-71,共6页Journal of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：我国《刑法修正案(八)》增设了食品监管渎职罪。日本刑法理论为解决不直接参与生产的监督者的责任问题提出的监督过失理论,为我国解决食品安全监督者的责任认定问题提供了思路。食品监管渎职罪主体的监督责任来源于法律授予的国家机关职责,监督者不限于具有国家机关工作人员身份的人。监督者的过失应当以结果回避义务为核心进行判断。监督者的行为与结果之间的因果联系以及被监督者的行为与结果之间的因果关系都应当以相当因果关系说为基础进行判断,以信赖原则和监督可能性为排除性理由。The Criminal Law Amendment（ VIII） has added the crime of malfeasance in food supervision.The theory of Japanese criminal law provides a way to solve the problem of the liability of supervisors who are not directly involved in production and to solve the problem of the liability of food safety supervisors in China. The supervisory liability of the subject of the malfeasance crime of food supervision originates from the liability of the state organ granted by law,and the supervisor is not limited to the person who has the status of the functionary of the state organ. The fault of the supervisor shall be judged whether the supervisor avoids the duty of result or not. The causal link between the conduct of the supervisor and the food safety incidents,and food producers and the outcome,shall be judged on the basis of the doctrine of reasonable causation. The principle of trust and the possibility of supervision are used as exclusionary grounds.

关 键 词：食品安全事故 监督过失 监督管理者 

分 类 号：F523[经济管理—产业经济]