检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭烁
机构地区:[1]北京交通大学法学院
出 处:《中国法学》2018年第3期228-248,共21页China Legal Science
基 金:2016年度国家社科基金青年项目"参与刑讯人员民事侵权责任问题研究"(项目批准号:16CFX030)的阶段性成果
摘 要:在推进新一轮司法改革的时代背景下,审视中国不起诉,尤其是酌定不起诉的预设功用及其现实处遇,对于我们思考、评估甚至"预测"在以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革过程中创设的刑事诉讼繁简分流程序大有裨益。通过比较法研究可以发现,酌定不起诉制度在世界范围内都有着广泛的理论共识与深度的效用空间,但在中国,该制度远未"物尽其用"。理清酌定不起诉与相应刑法条文之关系,对于提升该制度在诉讼经济及人权保障方面的作用意义重大。Under the background of advancing a new round of judicial reform, examining China's non-prosecution, especially the preconceived notions of discretionary non-prosecution and its realistic situation is conducive for us to thinking, evaluating or even to a certain extent "predicting" the complexity and simplicity separation mechanism for criminal procedures created in the process of reform of the litigation system centered on trial. In China, the discretionary non-prosecution is far from "making the best use", although the system has extensive theoretical consensus and deep utility space in the context of comparative law in the world. Clarifying the relationship between the discretionary non-prosecution and the corresponding criminal law provisions makes greater efforts to raise the litigation economy and better protect human rights.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49