论禁止权利滥用原则的法律适用  

On the Legal Application of the Principle of the Prohibition of Civil Rights Abuse

作　　者：彭诚信[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学凯原法学院

出　　处：《中国法学》2018年第3期249-268,共20页China Legal Science

基　　金：2016年度国家哲学社会科学重点基金项目"程序性权利理论的提出与证成研究"(项目批准号:16AFX003)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：权利滥用虽具有权利外观,但其权利的行使却不受法律保护。权利滥用的鉴别无统一标准,需通过权利人的主观意思、滥用权利的客观行为、对本人无益或获利远小于致他人受损、行为违反权利的客观目的等要素予以认定。权利滥用行为的不法性在性质上有别于侵权行为,以侵权方式解决权利滥用具有一定的制度性局限。禁止权利滥用作为一项法律原则,其适用应以原则的规则化为核心:即以鉴别要素为基础构建直接作为裁判依据的个案规范,具体法律后果包括停止侵害、剥夺权利、恢复原状、金钱赔偿以及行为不生法效果等。Although with the appearance of civil rights, in the circumstance of civil rights abuse, the exertion of rights is not legitimate, and thus is not protected by law. There is no uniform standard for the identification of the abuse of civil rights, and four elements need to be considered to determine： the intention of the obligee, the objective behavior of the civil rights abuse, no profit to the obligee or the gain is much less than others＇ loss, as well as the behavior is contrary to the objective purpose of rights. The unlawfulness of civil rights abuse is distinguished from tort in nature. To solve the civil rights abuse by liability for tort has certain institutional limitations. As a civil law principle, the application of the prohibition of civil rights abuse is based on the eoncretization of principles, namely, elements for identification need to be employed to form regulation schemes for individual cases as judicial basis. Legal consequences in specific cases are various, which include cessation of infringements, deprival of rights, restitution, compensation and invalidation of civil behavior, etc.

关 键 词：权利滥用 《民法总则》第132条 鉴别要素 侵权责任 法律原则规则化 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]