检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘忠山[1] 郭杰[1] 赵杨祉[2] 林霞[1] 任晓俊[1] 王红勇[1] 邱玲[1] 李云峰[1] 王铁君[1] Liu Zhongshan;Guo Jie;Zhao Yangzhi;Lin Xia;Ren Xiaojun;Wang Hongyong;Qiu Ling;LiYunfeng;Wang Tieiun(Department of Radiation Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130041, China (Liu ZS, Guo J, Lin X, Ren X J, Wang HY, Qiu L, Li YF, Wang T J;Cancer Center, First AJfiliated Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China ( Zhao YZ)
机构地区:[1]吉林大学第二医院肿瘤放疗科,长春130041 [2]吉林大学第一医院肿瘤中心,长春130021
出 处:《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》2018年第6期588-592,共5页Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
摘 要:探讨CT引导下组织间插植BT技术较传统腔内BT技术在局部晚期宫颈癌治疗中的剂量学优势,提供一种更加有利的临床治疗方法。方法 28例经过体外放疗后仍残留巨大肿块(肿瘤〉 5 cm)的局部晚期宫颈癌患者接受CT引导下的组织间插植BT。将该研究的剂量学结果,包括总剂量(体外放疗和BT)的HR-CTV D90和膀胱、直肠及乙状结肠的D2cc,与之前一组接受传统腔内BT (宫腔管+卵圆体对)的30例患者进行比较分析。结果 HR-CTV D90的平均值在腔内BT组、组织间插植BT组分别为(76.9±5.7)、(88.1±3.3) Gy。膀胱、直肠、乙状结肠D2cc在腔内BT组和组织间插植BT组中分别为(84.7±6.8)、(69.2±4.2)、(67.8±4.5) Gy 和(81.8±6.5)、(66.8±4.0)、(64.8±4.1) Gy。1年LC率在腔内BT组和组织间插植BT组分别为59.3%和85.2%。结论 与传统腔内BT相比较,CT引导下组织间插植BT技术具有剂量学优势或许是临床可行的,但长期疗效和不良反应还需进一步评估。Objective To discuss the dosimetric advantage of computed tomography-guided interstitial brachytherapy compared with the conventional intracavitary brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer,offering a more advantageous clinical treatment approach. Methods Twenty-eight locally advanced cervical cancer patients with bulky tumors (tumor size〉5 cm) after external beam radiotherapy received computed tomography-guided interstitial brachytherapy. Dosimetric outcomes of the current study,including the total dose (external beam radiotherapy+ brachytherapy) D90 for the HR-CTV and D2cc for the bladder,rectum,and sigmoid,were compared with a former patient group consisting of 30 patients who received the conventional intracavitary brachytherapy (uterine tandem+ ovoid pairs). Results The mean D90 value for HR-CTV in the intracavitary brachytherapy group and interstitial brachytherapy group were (76.9±5.7) and (88.1±3.3) Gy,respectively. The D2cc for the bladder,rectum,and sigmoid in the intracavitary brachytherapy group and interstitial brachytherapy group were (84.7±6.8) Gy,(69.2±4.2) Gy,(67.8±4.5) Gy and (81.8±6.5) Gy,(6.8±4.0) Gy,(64.8±4.1) Gy,respectively.1-year local tumor control rate in the intracavitary brachytherapy group and interstitial brachytherapy group were 59.3% and 85.2%,respectively. Conclusions CT-guided interstitial brachytherapy shows a significant dosimetric advantage compared with the conventional intracavitary brachytherapy,and is,thereby,clinically possible feasible. However,the long term curative effect and toxicity need to be further investigated.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43