检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:古晓东[1] 亓昕[2] 王庆安 高献书[2] 赵波[2] 李晓梅[2] 李洪振[2] 辛灵[3] 刘荫华[3] Gu Xiaodong;Qi Xin;Wang Qingan;Gao Xianshu;Zhao B;Li Xiaomei;Li Hongzhen;Xin Ling;Liu Yinhua(Department of Breast Radiation Oncology, Center of Radiation Therapy, Shanxi Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan 030013, China;Department of Radiation Oncology,Department of General Surgery, Peking University First Hospital,Beijing 100034, Chin)
机构地区:[1]山西省肿瘤医院放射治疗中心乳腺放疗科,太原030013 [2]北京大学第一医院放射治疗科,100034 [3]北京大学第一医院普通外科,100034
出 处:《中华放射医学与防护杂志》2018年第6期434-438,共5页Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
摘 要:目的 研究乳腺癌保乳保腋窝术后分别采用常规切线野(CTF)、三维适形放疗(3D-CRT)和正向调强放疗(IMRT)技术放疗中Ⅰ站、Ⅱ站和Ⅲ站腋窝淋巴结覆盖剂量。方法 回顾分析连续42例仅行前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)而未行腋窝淋巴结清扫的乳腺癌保乳术后T1-2N0M0期患者。按照放射治疗肿瘤协作组(RTOG)标准勾画Ⅰ站、Ⅱ站和Ⅲ站腋窝淋巴结引流区。每位患者均制定全乳+腋窝CTF、3D-CRT和IMRT 3种放疗计划,处方剂量为50 Gy/25次,分析腋窝淋巴结覆盖剂量。结果 CTF、3D-CRT和IMRT放疗计划腋窝各站受照剂量不同,I站累及平均剂量分别为(40.1±6.8)、(35.4±8.3)和(32.9±7.0)Gy(F=10.269,P〈0.05),Ⅱ站分别为(33.2±7.1)、(30.6±6.7)和(30.4±7.0)Gy(P〉0.05),Ⅲ站分别为(9.6±6.8)、(6.4±4.5)和(5.2±3.7)Gy(F=8.377,P〈0.05)。腋窝各站接受相同处方剂量的体积不同,I站V50(接受50 Gy处方剂量体积)分别为21.3%、27.6%和9.6%(F=13.161,P〈0.05),Ⅱ站V50分别为12.9%、15.9%和8.3%(P〉0.05),Ⅲ站V50分别为0.4%、0.1%和0(P〉0.05)。结论 早期乳腺癌保乳保腋窝术后采用CTF、3D-CRT和IMRT 3种放疗技术时腋窝Ⅰ站、Ⅱ站和Ⅲ站淋巴结引流区覆盖剂量有限,因此对于发现腋窝微转移、但未清扫腋窝的患者,应充分评估腋窝淋巴结转移风险,制定个体化放疗计划。Objective To evaluate the incidental irradiation to the axillary levels Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ during the whole breast radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery (BCS) without axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer (BC) patients. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the consecutive 42 cases of T1-2N0M0 stage BC patients with sentinel lymphnode biopsy (SLNB) and BCS but without ALND. The axillary lymph nodes of Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ were delineated according to RTOG atlas guideline. Three radiotherapy plans including conventional tangential field (CTF), three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and forward-planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for whole breast irradiation were devised for each case. The Prescription dose was 50 Gy per 25 fractions. Doses to axillary levels (Ⅰ-Ⅲ) were evaluated. Results The mean doses delivered to axillary by the three techniques (CTF, 3D-CRT and IMRT) were (40.1±6.8), (35.4±8.3), (32.9±7.0) Gy for level Ⅰ (F=10.269,P〈0.05), (33.2±7.1), (30.6±6.7), (30.4±7.0) Gy for level Ⅱ (P〉0.05) and (9.6±6.8), (6.4±4.5), (5.2±3.7) Gy for level Ⅲ (F=8.377,P〈0.05), respectively. V50(volume receiving 50 Gy) for the three techniques were 21.3%, 27.6%, 9.6% for level Ⅰ (F=13.161,P〈0.05), 12.9%, 15.9%, 8.3% for level Ⅱ(F=2.750,P〈0.05)and 0.4%, 0.1% and 0% for level Ⅲ(P〉0.05), respectively. Conclusions The doses coverage to axillary levels Ⅰ-Ⅲ were all limited in the three techniques. Therefore, it is necessary to assess the risk of axillary lymph node metastasis adequately to develop individualized radiotherapy plans.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.158