检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘旭 陆文明[1] Liu Xu;Lu Wenming(Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China)
出 处:《世界林业研究》2018年第3期83-86,共4页World Forestry Research
基 金:国家林业局林业科技发展项目“中国森林认证体系国际对接及国际推广”
摘 要:近年来林产品产销监管链认证在全球发展较快。目前PEFC和FSC这2大森林认证体系在全球影响力最大,发展也最为迅速。中国的林产品产销监管链认证体系已与PEFC产销监管链认证体系实现了互认,因此两者的标准结构与内容类似。文中主要从原料分类、信息、林产品加工转换过程以及销售和流通4个方面对比分析中国林产品产销监管链认证标准与FSC林产品产销监管链认证标准,总结其主要缺陷,并针对政策制定和实际监管提出建议。The Chain of Custody( Co C) certification has developed quickly at global level. Up to now,PEFC and FSC are the 2 most influencing and fast developing international forest certification schemes.CFCC Co C has been endorsed by the PEFC Co C,and the two are similar in standard contents and structure.This paper made the comparative analysis of CFCC Co C standard and PEFC Co C standard in terms of materials category,information,forest product processing and conversion and the sale and distribution,and concluded the main shortcomings. At the end,the suggestions were put forward for policy development and practices supervision.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145