检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]牛津大学中国中心 [2]清华大学新闻与传播学院,北京100084
出 处:《新闻大学》2018年第3期8-16,共9页Journalism Research
摘 要:新闻常规的话语想象以及政治经济学的理论批判、新媒体环境的现实挑战和中国语境下适用性问题的批评,构成了关于"新闻专业主义"论争的核心话题。为此,本文对专业化、专业性、专业主义三个关联概念进行了阐释和分析,构建了关于"专业自主性权力"和"专业自定义权力"两个面向的新闻专业主义。在对西方新闻专业主义经典论述的中国适用性问题进行案例讨论后,本文在"专业权力"的框架下,提出了中国新闻专业主义的可能方向在于超越"科层"和"市场",确认政治性和自主性,建构"有机的公共生活"。The arguments of journalistic professionalism were formed from two ways, including the discourse imagination of journalism routine and the critiques followed by three aspects, such as political economics approach, new media and technologies and applicability in Chinese context. Therefore, this article tried to illustrate and classify the three related concepts including professionalization, professionality and professionalism, which finally came out a two-dimension understanding of journalistic professionalism in terms of the professional autonomy authority and the professional definition authority. With a case interpretation on the applicability of the western classic style journalistic professionalism, the conclusion suggested a theoretical framework of professional authority with emphasizing on Politicalness and autonomy, in order to construct the "organic public life" beyond the bureaucracy and market rules.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.137.145