中文版问题性网络色情使用量表在大学生中信度及效度评价  被引量:3

Reliability and validity of the Problematic Internet Pornography Use Scale-Chinese Version among college students

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:陈丽君[1] 王欣[1] 陈世民[2] 江昌豪 王婧漩 CHEN Li-jun;WANG Xin;CHEN Shi-min(Department of Applied Psychology, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province 350106, China)

机构地区:[1]福州大学应用心理学系,福建福州350106 [2]中国矿业大学文法学院社会工作系

出  处:《中国公共卫生》2018年第7期1034-1038,共5页Chinese Journal of Public Health

基  金:国家社会科学基金教育学青年课题:青少年网络色情成瘾的认知基础及预测因素研究(CEA150173)

摘  要:目的评价中文版问题性网络色情使用量表(PPUS)的信度和效度,为该量表在中国大学生中的推广提供科学依据。方法由8名心理学研究人员和1名英语专业人员对PPUS原量表进行翻译和回译,并根据中国语言习惯对个别词句进行微调形成中文版PPUS量表;于2016年11月采取随机抽样方法抽取福建、山东、辽宁、广东、陕西5个省的7所高校1 026名大学生进行中文版PPUS量表、性态度量表(ATSS)、自测健康评定量表(SRHMS)和网络色情行为问卷(OSA)调查;采用内部一致性系数、重测信度、结构效度和效标效度进行中文版PPUS量表信度及效度的评价。结果项目分析结果显示,中文版PPUS量表的12个条目得分与所属维度得分的相关系数为0.83~0.93(均P<0.001),量表具有较好的项目区分度。探索性因素分析结果显示,中文版PPUS量表4个公因子的累计方差贡献率为81.85%,除条目6外的其他各条目所属因子结构与原量表基本一致。验证性因子分析结果显示,量表原结构和探索性因素分析结构的非标准拟合指数(TLI)、比较拟合指数(CFI)、近似平方根误差(RMSEA)分别为0.959和0.957、0.967和0.966、0.046和0.046,量表原结构拟合最好,按原结构进行信度和效度检验。中文版PPUS量表总体Cronbach's a系数为0.95,重测信度为0.89;痛苦和功能问题、过度使用、控制困难、为逃避负性情绪而使用4个维度Cronbach's a系数分别为0.81、0.88、0.91、0.88,重测信度分别为0.61、0.70、0.66、0.62,量表具有较好的信度。大学生中文版PPUS、ATSS、心理健康、社会健康、OSA量表总分分别为(9.46±9.38)、(38.00±5.97)、(99.99±15.62)、(92.08±17.91)、(22.14±12.54)分;中文版PPUS量表总分与ATSS和OSA量表总分均呈正相关(P=0.13、0.57,均P<0.001),与SRHMS量表中心理健康、社会健康均呈负相关(r=-0.15、-0.11,均P<0.001),量表具有较好的效标效度。男生中文版PPUS量表痛苦和功能�Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Problematic Internet Pornography Use Scale-Chinese Version (PPUS-C) and to provide evidences for application of the scale among Chinese college students.Methods Eight psychology researchers translated the original PPUS into Chinese first and then one English professional translated the PPUS-C back into English. Several minor linguistic modifications were performed for several words and expressions in original PPUS. We conducted a survey among a total of 1 026 students randomly selected in 7 universities in Fujian, Shandong, Liaoning, Guangdong, and Shaanxi province in November 2016. PPUS-C, the Attitudes Towards Sexuality Scale (ATSS), Self Rated Health Measurement Scale (SRHMS), and Online Sexual Activities (OSA) were used in the survey. Internal consistency coefficient, test-retest reliability, construct validity, and criterion validity were adopted to evaluate the reliability and validity of the PPUS-C.Results Item analysis demonstrated that the correlation coefficients between scores of 12 items and their factor scores ranged from 0.83 to 0.93 for the PPUS-C (all P 〈 0.001), indicating a good item discrimination of the scale. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a cumulative variance contribution rate of 81.85% for the 4 common factors of the PPUS-C. The factor structures for all the items of the PPUS-C were generally consistent with those of the original PPUS, except for the 6th item. Confirmatory factor analyses on the structure of original PPUS produced a Tucker-Lewis index (TLI)of 0.959, comparative fit index (CFI)of 0.967, and a root mean square error of approximate (RMSEA)of 0.046; the exploratory factor analyses on the structure of PPUS-C revealed a TLI of 0.957,CFI of 0.966,and RMSEA of 0.046; the results suggest a better fitting of the structure of original PPUS so the reliability and validity evaluation were performed according to the structure original PPUS. For the PPUS-C, the overall Cronbach's α coeffi

关 键 词:中文版问题性网络色情使用量表(PPUS) 信度 效度 大学生 

分 类 号:B844.2[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象