论民事上诉不开庭审理——兼评《民事诉讼法》第169条之规定  

Study on the No-hearing in the Civil Appeals:A View of Article 169 of Civil Procedure Law

作　　者：田海鑫[1] TIAN Hai-xin(School of Humanities and Social Sciences,Nortli China Electric Power University,Beijing 102206,China)

机构地区：[1]华北电力大学人文与社会科学学院,北京102206

出　　处：《华北电力大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第3期88-94,共7页Journal of North China Electric Power University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目"民事诉讼失权理论研究"(2017MS064);北京市社会科学基金项目"北京市民事虚假诉讼类型化及规制研究"(16FXC035)

摘　　要：民事上诉不开庭审理是上诉案件的审理方式之一,体现了对民事诉讼效益价值的追求。从域外国家和地区的立法和司法实践来看,民事上诉开庭审理是原则,不开庭审理是例外,在特定情形下才能适用。我国《民事诉讼法》第169条对于上诉不开庭的进行了规定,但在实践中由于法律规定过于笼统,以及司法资源的有限性,上诉不开庭审理在各地的适用情况较为混乱。为了完善这一制度,应当对上诉不开庭审理进行合理定位,并且制定详细的程序规范。The no-hearing of civil appeals is one of the ways to hear the appellate cases,which embodies the pursuit of the benefit value of civil litigation. In terms of the legislative and judicial practices of foreign countries and regions,the no-hearing of civil appeals is an exception,which can only be applied in certain situations. Article 169 of Civil Procedure Law has formulated the rules. But in practice because the law is too general,the judicial resources are limited,and applicable situation of appeal no-hearing is confusion. In order to improve the system,it should make reasonable positioning of the appellate no-hearing and make detailed procedure specification.

关 键 词：民事诉讼 上诉 不开庭 审理 

分 类 号：D915.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]