检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:况莉 何英姿[2] 曹燕[2] 陈勤勤[2] 章惠英[1] 许燕玲[3] KUANG Li HE Yingzi;CAO Yan;CHEN Qinqin;ZHANG Huiying;XU Yanling(School of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200025, Chin)
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学护理学院,上海市200025 [2]上海交通大学附属第六人民医院神经内科 [3]上海交通大学附属第六人民医院护理部
出 处:《中国护理管理》2018年第7期915-921,共7页Chinese Nursing Management
摘 要:目的:通过Meta分析评价运动想象疗法(Motor Imagery,MI)对脑卒中患者步行功能的影响。方法:通过计算机对Cochrane Library、MEDLINE、Web of Science、EMBASE、EBSCO、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网、维普数据库、万方数据库中运动想象疗法对脑卒中患者步行功能影响的随机对照试验进行检索,并追溯相关文献的参考文献;2名研究人员独立进行文献筛查、数据的提取,评价并纳入文献,采用Revman5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入7篇文献,包括259例研究对象;Meta分析结果显示,与常规康复相比,运动想象疗法有助于提高步幅[MD=9.88,95%CI(0.46,19.30),P=0.04]、Fugl-Meyer运动评分量表下肢部分(FMA-LE)评分[MD=2.24,95%CI(0.90,3.58),P=0.001]、功能性步行功能分级(Functional Ambulation Category Scale,FAC)[MD=0.58,95%CI(0.28,0.88),P<0.001],但运动想象疗法不能改善10米最大步行速度[MD=4.24,95%CI(-3.23,11.71),P=0.27]、患侧平均步长[MD=-3.20,95%CI(-10.33,3.93),P=0.38]和健侧平均步长[MD=1.36,95%CI(-3.00,5.71),P=0.54]。结论:运动想象疗法有助于提高步幅、FMA-LE得分和FAC分级,但在10米最大步行速度、患侧平均步长和健侧平均步长方面尚未有明显优势,仍需要多中心、大样本的随机对照研究加以证实。Objective: To evaluate the effects of Motor Imagery on walking function in stroke patients. Methods: A computerized search was performed on the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, EBSCO, CBMdisc, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Database, and relevant references were also traced, for Randomized Controlled Trails (RCTs) studying the effects of Motor Imagery on walking function. Two reviewers independently searched databases, extracted data and assessed the quality of included studies. Meta-analysis was conducted using Revman 5.3. Results: Seven RCTs and 259 patients were included in our Meta-analysis. The Meta-analysis showed that compared with conventional rehabilitation, Motor Imagery could improve Stride Length [MD=9.88,95% CI (0.46,19.30), P=0.04], Fug-Meyer Assessment-Lower Extremity (FMA-LE) score [MD=2.24, 95% CI=(0.90, 3.58), P=0.001], Functional Ambulation Category Scale (FAC) score [MD=0.58, 95% CI (0.28, 0.88), P〈0.001]. But Motor Imagery could not increase 10MWS [MD=4.24, 95% CI (-3.23, 11.71), P=0.27], average step length of paretic side [MD=-3.20, 95% CI (-10.33, 3.93), P=0.38] and average step length of non-paretic side [MD=1.36, 95% CI (-3.00, 5.71), P=0.54]. Conclusion: Motor Imagery is effective to improve Stride Length, FMA-LE and FAC scores. While it cannot increase 10MWS, average step length of paretic side and non-paretic side. Multicenter and large sample RCTs are still needed to confirm the effects of Motor Imagery on walking function in stroke patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.21.125.194