我国行政审判白皮书研究  

Research on China's Administrative Trials White Paper

作　　者：章志远[1] ZHANG Zhi-yuan(Law School of East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai, 20004)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院

出　　处：《行政法学研究》2018年第4期95-105,共11页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW

基　　金：中国法学会2017年度部级专项课题"领导干部法治思维研究"(CLS2017ZX01)

摘　　要：作为人民法院主动延伸行政审判职能、积极助推法治政府建设的创新性互动举措,行政审判白皮书在我国经历了摸索尝试、积极推广和蓬勃发展等三个阶段。行政审判白皮书的兴起,既体现了回应型司法理念传播和商谈型权力关系建构的努力,也是人民法院对源头型社会治理模式的积极响应。行政审判白皮书发展目前面临着法律依据欠缺、功能定位模糊和回应实效匮乏的实践困境。为了保障行政审判白皮书的有效运作,应从依据成文化、定位精准化和回应公开化等方面进行努力,建构新时代中国特色的行政审判制度体系。As an innovative and interactive measure for the People＇s Courts to proactively extend the function of administrative trials and actively promote the construction of the rule of law, the administrative trials white paper has experienced three stages： trial-and-error, active ment. The rise of the administrative trials white paper not only embodies responsive ju of the People promotion the efforts , and vigorous develop- of the dissemination of dicial ideas and the construction of negotiated power relations, but also the positive response ＂s Court to the source-based social governance model. The development of administrative trials white paper is currently faced with practical difficulties such as lack of legal basis, vague function positioning, and lack of effective response. In order to ensure the effective operation of the administrative trials white paper, efforts based on the foundation of culture, the precision of positioning, and the response to openness should be made to establish a new era of the administrative trials system with Chinese characteristics.

关 键 词：行政审判 白皮书 回应型司法 源头型治理 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]