我国预备反诉制度之建构  

The Construction of China’s Preparatory Counterclaim System

作　　者：李祖军[1] Li Zujun

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学

出　　处：《政法论坛》2018年第4期45-56,共12页Tribune of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：预备反诉作为促进纠纷一次性解决之制度,在维护当事人权利、提高诉讼效率、避免矛盾判决、尊重被告程序选择权等方面发挥着积极作用。当前预备反诉理论和司法实践在域外蓬勃发展,我国亦出现了预备反诉案件,但由于立法之缺失,导致在司法实践中无法可依。预备反诉之法理基础为平衡当事人诉权,避免矛盾判决,追求诉讼经济,实现程序保障,与反诉之性质相同,属于独立之诉。With the rapid development of social economy,various social disputes are increasing,and the counterclaim system is prepared as an important system of one-time settlement of disputes related to this action. It is necessary to maintain the rights of litigants,improve the efficiency of litigation,avoid contradictory judgments. Preparatory counterclaims have been recognized and developed abroad. Although China has prepared a counterclaim in judicial practice,China is still blank in the legislation of the preparatory counterclaim system,which cannot be made in judicial practice. In particular,there are many problems in the legal basis,procedural attribute and referee rule of the preliminary counterclaim,which has not yet been studied deeply.We should define the jurisprudential basis to prepare for the construction of the counterclaim in our country.

关 键 词：预备反诉 预备合并 主位抗辩 审理规则 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]