高校科技创新团队“定性”与“定量”评价及其优化措施  

Qualitative and quantitative evaluation and optimization solutions of university Sci-Tech innovation team

作　　者：王晓蓬 许安琪 WANG Xiaopeng;XU Anqi(Academy of Science and Technology,Zhejiang Sci-Tech University,Hangzhou 310018,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江理工大学科学技术研究院,杭州310018

出　　处：《浙江理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第3期237-242,共6页Journal of Zhejiang Sci-Tech University：Social Sciences

摘　　要：建立科学、客观、公正的考核评价制度,优化高校科技创新团队的科研考核环境,关系着我国科技文化产业和科技创新事业的长远发展。现有的高校针对科技创新团队的评价机制,重视量化的"硬指标",忽视定性的"软指标",由于"定量"和"定性"评价的作用力"不均匀",很容易使得高校科技创新团队陷入"量化"考评机制"功利主义"的漩涡,拉断"定性"与"定量"链式评价体系的"链条"。为此,要需建立相关"定性"评价的考核队伍,优化"定量"评价的考核指标,并健全"定性"与"定量"的"链式"评价机制。Establishing a scientific,objective and fair assessment system and optimizing the scientific research assessment environment of scientific and technological innovation teams in universities are closely related to the long-term development of China＇s scientific,technological,cultural industries and scientific and technological innovation.The existing university evaluation mechanism for Sci-Tech innovation tea,pays attention to the quantitative ＂hard index＂and ignores the qualitative ＂soft index＂.Because acting force of＂quantitative＂and＂qualitative＂evaluation is＂uneven＂,it is easy to make the university Sci-Tech innovation team caught into the＂utilitarianism＂whirlpool of quantitative evaluation mechanism,break the chain of ＂quantitative＂and ＂qualitative＂chain-type evaluation system.Thus,it is required to build＂qualitative＂evaluation team,optimize＂quantitative＂evaluation indexes and improve ＂quantitative＂and＂qualitative＂＂chain-type＂evaluation mechanism.

关 键 词：高校 科技创新团队 定性 定量 评价 

分 类 号：C936[经济管理—管理学]