检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋炜 SONG Wei(Shaanxi Kangfu Hospital,Xi'an 710065,China)
出 处:《临床医学研究与实践》2018年第22期152-153,共2页Clinical Research and Practice
摘 要:目的分析食管双对比造影应用于早期食管癌放射诊断中的临床效果。方法选择我院2015年8月至2017年8月纳入的59例早期食管癌患者为研究对象,均采用超声内镜诊断与食管双对比造影诊断。以病理结果作为最终标准,对比两种方法的诊断符合率。结果超声内镜诊断的诊断符合率为81.36%,低于食管双对比造影诊断早期食管癌的诊断符合率(96.61%),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论针对早期食管癌患者,可考虑采用食管双对比造影技术,其临床检出率高,临床价值明显,可实现对患者的无创诊断,做到对早期食管癌的定性、定位、定期、分型,为临床下一步开展疾病的治疗有一定的辅助作用,值得临床推广与应用。Objective To analyze the clinical effect of esophageal double contrast examination in the radiologicaldiagnosis of early esophageal cancer. Methods From August 2015 to August 2017, a total of 59 patients with earlyesophageal cancer were enrolled in this study. All of them were given endoscopic ultrasonography and esophageal doublecontrast examination. Pathological results were used as the final standard, the diagnostic coincidence rates of the twomethods were compared. Results The diagnostic coincidence rate of endoscopic ultrasonography was 81.36%, which waslower than 96.61% of the diagnostic coincidence rate of esophageal double contrast angiography in the diagnosis of earlyesophageal cancer, the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). Conclusion For patients with early esophagealcancer, esophageal double contrast angiography may be considered, the clinical detection rate of which is high, the clinicalvalue is obvious. It can achieve noninvasive diagnosis of patients, can get the qualitative, positioning, regular, typingdiagnosis of the early esophageal cancer, so as to plays a certain auxiliary role in the next step of clinical treatment ofdiseases, it is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.141.164.253