休谟哲学的三种解读模式  

Three Modes to Understand the Philosophy of David Hume

作　　者：张连富 ZHANG Lianfu(School of Philosophy ＆ Social Development,Guizhou University,Guiyang,Guizhou,550025,Chin)

机构地区：[1]贵州大学哲学与社会发展学院,贵州贵阳550025

出　　处：《贵州大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第4期45-52,共8页Journal of Guizhou University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：贵州大学人文社会科学科研项目"休谟自然主义思想研究"(GDQN2017017)

摘　　要：在西方哲学史上,休谟首先是以伟大的怀疑论者身份出现的,"休谟哲学"也是以摧毁一切知识的"怀疑主义"的形式出现的。这一情况一直延续到上世纪上半叶康普·斯密提出对休谟哲学的富有启发性的"自然主义"解读为止。围绕着休谟的经验论、怀疑主义以及自然主义之间的不同关系,对于休谟哲学,在西方哲学史上出现了三种解读模式:第一种把休谟哲学解读为最为彻底的经验论和怀疑主义哲学;第二种把休谟从英国传统的经验论中解放出来,把休谟哲学看作是一个协调一致的自然主义体系;第三种则是把休谟哲学看作是前两者的综合或者折中,认为休谟哲学包含了两种相互冲突矛盾的学说。In the history of western philosophy, David Hume appeared as the great skeptic, thus his philosophy turned out to be the skepticism destroying all forms of knowledge, until K.Smith put forward his inspiring analysis of Hume’s philosophy from the perspective of naturalism in the first half of 20th Century. There are three ways to understand the philosophy of David Hume surrounding his empiricism, skepticism, and naturalism： his philosophy is regarded as the extremest empiricism and skepticism philosophy in the first version of understanding; the second one frees his philosophy from the traditional British empiricism, viewing his philosophy as a coordinated system of naturalism; and the last one is the combination of the other two contradicted theories.

关 键 词：休谟 经验论 怀疑主义 自然主义 

分 类 号：B561[哲学宗教—外国哲学]