检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邓兴明[1] 吕国庆[1] 雷云鹏[1] 吴建龙 DENG Xing-ruing;LV Guo-qing;LEI Yun-peng(Peking University Shenzhen Hospital,Shenzhen 518033,China)
机构地区:[1]北京大学深圳医院胃肠外科,广东深圳518033
出 处:《吉林医学》2018年第6期1011-1012,共2页Jilin Medical Journal
基 金:深圳市"三名工程"[项目编号:210601004];深圳市卫生和计生系统科研项目[项目编号:SZXJ2017078]
摘 要:目的:通过对比腹腔镜和开腹手术行原发灶切除联合D_2淋巴结清扫治疗老年进展期胃癌的效果,为老年进展期胃癌的临床治疗提供有价值的参考依据。方法:选择收治的108例老年进展期胃癌患者为研究对象,根据手术方法的不同分为腹腔镜组和开腹组,对比两组的治疗效果。结果:与开腹组相比,腹腔镜组出血量明显减少,术后恢复流食时间、胃管留置时间以及住院时间缩短,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:腹腔镜下行原发灶切除联合D_2淋巴结清扫术有助于提高老年进展期胃癌的治疗效果。Objective To compare the efficacy of laparoscopic and open radical resection combined with D2 lymph node dissection in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer,so as to provide valuable reference for the clinical treatment of elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer. Method 108 elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer who were admitted to our hospital were selected as research subjects. They were divided into endoscopic group and open group according to different operative methods. The therapeutic effects of two groups were compared. Results Compared with laparotomy group,laparoscopic group can significantly reduce the amount of bleeding,shorten the postoperative recovery time,liquid gastric tube indwelling time and hospitalization time,the difference was statistically significant( P〈0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic resection of primary foci combined with D2 lymph node dissection can help to improve the therapeutic effect of advanced gastric cancer in the elderly.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229