检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李鼎[1] LI Ding(Shandong University-Weihai,Weihai Shandong 264209,China)
机构地区:[1]山东大学(威海)法学院,山东威海264209
出 处:《齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2018年第6期104-107,共4页Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
摘 要:我国恶意串通规范由于适用条件模糊,造成了与众多法律规范的竞合。对无权处分、债权人撤销权、欺诈、滥用代理权、多重买卖等规则进行考察后,可以发现,在恶意串通规范与其他规范发生竞合后,如果规范目的不冲突,则交给当事人自行选择适用的规范;如果规范目的相冲突,则需要首先确定存在法律漏洞,并且以恶意串通规范填补法律漏洞更为可取。With the ambiguous terms application,malicious collusion in China caused competitive applications in many clauses.After the settlement of unauthorized disposition,the right of debt revocation,fraud,abuse of the purchase and multi-purchase,it can be found that when the competitive applications between the malicious collusion and other clauses happened,if there are not conflicted purposes among them,the parties can choose how to apply the clauses. Whereas,if there are conflicted purposes among the clauses,the loophole need be assured and it should be sure that the malicious collusion is more suitable.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.225.56.198