检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:施卫忠[1] 李秀杰[2] 胡淼[2] 高立中[2] SHI Weizhong;LI Xiujie;HU Miao;GAO Lizhong(China Academy of Railway Sciences,Beijing 100081,China;Signal and Communication Research Institute,China Academy of Railway Sciences,Beijing 100081,China)
机构地区:[1]中国铁道科学研究院,北京100081 [2]中国铁道科学研究院通信信号研究所,北京100081
出 处:《铁道学报》2018年第6期1-10,共10页Journal of the China Railway Society
基 金:铁道科学技术研究发展中心项目(J2015X001)
摘 要:本文进行27t轴重货车驼峰试验,发现重载条件下编组站驼峰存在制动能力不足的问题,将导致驼峰的效率和安全性都有所降低。为适应重载运输需求,对驼峰改造提出两个方案:分别在各制动位增加调速设备能力;集中在调车线内增设四部位减速器。本文就两种方案进行研究探讨,分析其优势和不足,选取典型站场的实际运行数据进行间接验证,重点通过构建仿真测试平台模拟两种方案在27t轴重条件下的溜放作业过程。研究结果表明:方案2在溜放作业效率和安全两方面都比方案1有较大提高。This paper firstly introduced the test of 27 t-axle heavy freight cars in railway hump yards.The test showed that insufficient braking ability in the hump yard under heavy load conditions resulted in the decrease of efficiency and safety of the hump yard.In order to meet the demand for heavy load operation in hump yards,two schemes were proposed for hump yard modification.The first scheme was to increase the capacity of the speed regulating equipment at each braking position.The second scheme was to add the forth braking position within the shunting line.The two schemes were studied and their advantages and and disadvantages were analyzed.The actual operation data of typical hump yards were selected for indirect verification of the schemes.Based on the establishment of the simulation platform for hump yard break-up operation,the car rolling operation of each scenario was simulated on the platform under 27 t-axle heavy load conditions.The simulation data show that the second scheme has higher efficiency and safety than the first scheme,which will promote the development of heavy load railway.
分 类 号:U291.4[交通运输工程—交通运输规划与管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43