澳门与内地刑事简易程序比较研究  

Comparative Study of Criminal Summary Procedure between Macao and Mainland

作　　者：刘佳加 LIU Jia-jia(Criminal Justice College, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing, 100088, Chin)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《太原学院学报（社会科学版）》2018年第2期49-53,65,共6页Journal of Taiyuan University(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：刑事简易程序是提高诉讼效率、合理配置司法资源的重要方式。我国内地的刑事简易程序确立于1996年《刑事诉讼法》,新《刑事诉讼法》又对其进行了重要改革。但任何制度设置都不可能毕其功于一役,需要根据实践不断改良。作为多种法律文化融合的独特景观,澳门的刑事简易程序在形式、适用范围、适用条件、审判组织和审判人员、辩护人的介入方式和组成方面与内地有诸多不同,研究两地刑事诉讼价值取向的不同有助于我们理解这些差异,在此基础上反思两者的互补之处,对完善两地的刑事简易程序大有裨益。Criminal summary procedure is an important way to improve the efficiency of litigation and rational allocation of judicial resources. The criminal summary procedure in our country was established in the 1996 in Criminal Procedure Law,and the new Criminal Procedure Law has also undergone important reform. But any system settings can not be completed in one time,it needs to continue to improve according to practice. As a unique landscape of the integration of various legal cultures,the criminal summary procedure of Macao is different from that of the Mainland in many aspects including scope of application,conditions of application,trial organization,trial personnel and counselor. The study of the differences in the value orientation of criminal proceedings in Chinese Mainland and Macao will help us to understand these discrepancies. On this basis,it is helpful to reflect on the complementarities between the two places and to improve their criminal summary procedure.

关 键 词：刑事简易程序 澳门“刑事诉讼法典” 刑事诉讼法 差异 原因 完善 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]