检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李晶洁[1] 侯绘丽 宋军[1] Li Jingjie;Hou Huili;Song Jun(College of Foreign Languages,Donghua University,Shanghai 201620,China)
机构地区:[1]东华大学外语学院,上海201620
出 处:《上海理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2018年第2期135-141,共7页Journal of University of Shanghai for Science and Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基 金:国家社科基金项目"短语学视域下的学术语篇行为研究"(14CYY049)阶段性成果
摘 要:学术写作并非完全机械化,也并非全盘避免作者主观情感的介入。学术作者使用多种话语策略来宣传其观点和立场,营造和谐对话空间,与读者形成良好互动,从而引导读者接受所述命题观点。基于学术语篇互动模型,分别从模糊语策略、作者身份构建方式以及作者与读者的隐性互动三个方面来阐释学术写作中的互动式话语策略。研究表明,每个学科都有其偏好的写作模式,教师应引导学生关注所属学科的语言范式,培养学生的读者意识,并在学术写作中采用积极有效、易于被读者接受的互动策略有力发声,推进研究。Academic w riting is not completely objective or impersonal. Academic w riters employ multiple discourse strategies to expound their view s and stance,to create a harmonious dialogue space and a good interaction w ith readers,and ultimately to guide readers through an argument and tow ards a preferred interpretation and acceptance. Based on the model of interaction in academic discourse,this paper explores the most common interaction strategies in academic w riting in terms of hedges,construction of authorial identity, and implicit w riter-reader interaction. It is found that different disciplines may have respectively preferred w riting style,and teachers should draw students' attention to those disciplinary differences in w riting norms and conventions to raise their "reader aw areness",so that the students can learn how to make an assertive statement and promote their research through appropriate interaction strategies in the w riting process.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145