刑讯逼供“等”字的法教义学分析——从文义解释到实质解释  

Analysis of legal doctrine on “etcetera” in extorting a confession by torture——From the literal interpretation to the substantive interpretation

作　　者：夏文忠 Xia Wenzhong(Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou Zhejiang 310018,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江工商大学,浙江杭州310018

出　　处：《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》2018年第3期73-77,共5页Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice

基　　金：2017年最高人民检察院检察理论研究一般课题"起诉标准与定罪标准关系研究"(项目批准号:GJ2017C23)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：非法证据排除规则中的"等"字有"等内等"与"等外等"之分。通过文义解释与体系解释,发现《刑事诉讼法》针对"刑讯逼供等非法手段"中的"等"字不应当作形式"等内等"之理解。实质解释认为刑讯逼供只是侵犯基本权利的众多方法中的一种,对"等"字的理解应当从人权保障的角度重新考虑。只有对现有的法律文本中非法言词证据排除的立法表述与意义空间进行科学有益的探索,才能充分理解"等"字的内在逻辑与隐含价值,从而形成具有理论价值与实践操作性的非法证据排除规则体系。The word＂etcetera＂in the rule of excluding illegal evidence is divided into ＂inside etcetera＂and＂outside etcetera＂. Through the literal interpretation and the systematic interpretation, it was found that the word＂etcetera＂in the＂extorting a confession by torture,etcetera, illegal means＂in the＂Criminal Procedure Law＂should not be understood as a form of＂inside etcetera＂. The substantive interpretation believes that extorting a confession by torture is only one of the many methods of infringing basic rights, that the understanding of the word＂etcetera＂should be reconsidered from the perspective of human rights protection. Only a scientific and beneficial exploration of the legal expression and meaning space of the exclusion of the illegal verbal evidence in the existing legal texts can fully understand the inherent logic and hidden value of the word＂etcetera＂, thus forming the system of rule of excluding illegal evidence with theoretical value and practical operation.

关 键 词：刑讯逼供 非法言词证据 法教义学 文义解释 实质解释 

分 类 号：D915.13[政治法律—诉讼法学]