检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张斌[1] 陈洁[1] ZHANG Bin;CHEN Jie(Beijing Environmental Sanitation Engineering Research Institute,Beijing Key Laboratocy of Municipal Solid Waste Detection Analysis and Evaluation,Beijing 100028,China)
机构地区:[1]北京市环境卫生设计科学研究所,生活垃圾检测分析与评价北京市重点实验室,北京100028
出 处:《环境科学导刊》2018年第A01期131-134,共4页Environmental Science Survey
摘 要:分析了动态嗅觉测量法、气相色谱质谱—嗅觉测量法以及电子鼻测量法的技术优缺点。以垃圾填埋场与堆肥设施的气味检测为例,对嗅觉测量法与电子鼻测量法进行了技术对比。动态嗅觉测量法提供了某一地点气味的浓度数据,但无法持续实地测量,耗时严重并且成本高昂;电子鼻测量法分析成本较低并可以快速获得检测结果,可以实施持续性实地监测。经过训练的电子鼻加上合适的数据处理方法,能够有效地解决气味持续监测的问题。The article aims to present the advantages and disadvantages of odour detection technologies of olfactormery,Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry coupled with olfactometric detection( GC-MS/O),electronic-noses. The applications of olfactometry and electronic-noses were compared in landfill and composting facility.Dynamicolfactometry provided point odour concentration data did not allow continuous and field measurements. It was too time-consuming and quite expensive. Electronic noses presented lower analysis costs and quick results and allowed continuous monitoring. Some studies demonstrated that a trained electronic nose and suitable data processing methods could represent a valid solution to the problem of continuously monitoring odour.
分 类 号:X851[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229