论康德的时空先天性论证  

On Kant's Apriority Thesis of Space and Time

作　　者：王咏诗[1] WANG Yongshi(School of Public Administration,Sichuan University,Chengdu,Sichuan,610064.)

机构地区：[1]四川大学公共管理学院哲学系

出　　处：《安徽大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2018年第4期28-37,共10页Journal of Anhui University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目(14BZX061);四川大学中央高校基本科研业务费研究专项项目(skq201405)

摘　　要：康德对时空问题的处理是理解其批判哲学的关键。然而他的时空先天性论证却存在问题,因此历史上就该论证所引发的疑难产生了诸多讨论。在很大程度上,后世哲学的走向与这一疑难的解决存在着或隐或显的关联。正因为康德时空问题的困难性与重要性,才有必要对康德先天性论证内部所隐含的主观性要求进行细致分析,并对历来的争论进行考辨。借此,可以推演出三种克服疑难的补充解释方案,继而澄清其与各思想流向的关系。Kant s proof of Space-Time is the key to understanding his critical philosophy. But the apriority thesis of Space-Time is problematic, which leads to many discussions. How we overcome the problem has a lot to do with the development of subsequent schools of philosophy. Because of the difficulty and importance of Kant s Space-Time issue, it is necessary to analyze in detail the implied subjectivity requirements of the apriority thesis and to examine disputes arising from relevant discussions. Three extension schemes can be derived to explain the relation between the Space-Time issue of Kant and the development of different schools of philosophy.

关 键 词：康德 形而上学阐明 先天性论证 时间 空间 

分 类 号：B516[哲学宗教—外国哲学]