检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:晏奇 花放 苏美莹 刘诗瑶 施斌[1,2] YAN Qi;HUA Fang;SU Meiying;LIU Shiyao;SHI Bin(Hubei-MOST KLOS & KLOBM,School & Hostpital of Stomatology,Wuhan University,Wuhan,430010,P.R.China;Department of lmplantology,School and Hospital of Stomatology,Wuhan University,Wuhan,430010,P.R.China;Cochrane Oral Health,Division of Dentistry,University of Manchester,Manchester,M13 9PL,United Kingdom;Nanfang Hostpital,Southern Medical University,Guangzhou,510515,P.R.China)
机构地区:[1]口腔基础医学省部共建国家重点实验室培育基地/口腔生物医学教育部重点实验室,武汉大学口腔医学院,武汉430079 [2]武汉大学口腔医院口腔种植科,武汉430079 [3]英国曼彻斯特大学牙医学院Cochrane口腔健康组,英国M139PL [4]南方医科大学南方医院,广州510515
出 处:《中国循证医学杂志》2018年第8期858-864,共7页Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
基 金:国家卫生计生委员会国家临床重点专科建设项目
摘 要:目的系统评价种植体支持式下颌覆盖义齿和传统下颌总义齿比较的患者满意度。方法计算机检索Pub Med、EMbase、The Cochrane Library、CNKI、Wan Fang、VIP等数据库,搜集种植体支持式下颌覆盖义齿与常规义齿比较的随机对照试验(RCT),检索时限均为建库至2016年11月31日。由2位评价员独立筛选文献、提取资料并评价纳入研究的偏倚风险后,采用Rev Man 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果最终纳入9个RCT。Meta分析结果显示,与传统义齿相比,种植支持式覆盖义齿的患者满意度[SMD=1.11,95%CI(0.79,1.43),P<0.001]和口腔健康的生活质量[MD=–12.41,95%CI(–18.96,–5.86),P<0.001]更高。结论现有证据表明,对于下颌无牙颌患者,种植体支持式的覆盖义齿是比传统义齿满意度更高的选择。受纳入研究质量和数量的限制,上述结论仍需更多大样本高质量研究予以验证。Objectives To systematically review the patients' satisfaction of implant supported mandibular dentures and conventional dentures. Methods PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang and VIP databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on patients' satisfaction of implant supported mandibular dentures (IODs) and conventional dentures (CDs) from inception to November 31st, 2016. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies. Then, meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. Results Seven randomized-controlled trials were identified. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with CDs group, IODs group had a relatively higher level of patients' satisfaction (SMD=I,ll, 95%CI 0,79 to 1.43, P〈0.001) and oral health quality of life (MD=-12.41, 95%CI -18.96 to -5.86, P〈0.001). Conclusions The current evidence suggests that IODs may be a better choice for mandibular edentulous patients than CDs. Due to the limitations of the quality and quantity of the included studies, the above conclusions still require larger sample and high quality research to verify.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15