检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张桂霞[1] ZHANG Gui-xia(Department of Law, Henan Police College, Zhengzhou 450000, China)
出 处:《广西警察学院学报》2018年第3期1-7,共7页Journal of Guangxi Police College
摘 要:侦查中心主义制度下证据收集存在证据收集种类的偏向性、内容的片面性和过程的不规范性等问题。以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革要求坚持证据裁判原则、深化程序法定原则、践行直接言词原则。侦查机关必须重塑侦查取证意识,确保证据收集的全面性;规范证据收集行为,确保证据材料的证据能力;健全证据保全制度,确保证据材料的证明力;构建多元化的证据审查方法,确保证据经得起法律检验;提高证据运用能力,确保全案证据达到法定证明标准。Under the investigation centralism, evidence collection witnesses category preference, one-sided contents and substandard procedures.The reform of trial-centered litigation system calls for persistence in principle of evidentiary adjudication, intensification of procedure law and practice of direct speech. Investigation organs are expected to remould consciousness of investigation and forensics so as to guarentee all-sidedness of evidence collection, standardization of evidence collection and credibility of evidence materials, improve evidence preservation system and construct diversified evidence review methods so as to guarentee, and enhance evidence application ability so as to guarentee achievement of the case's legal evidence standard.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229