检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张弘[1] 吉朝然 Zhang Hong;Ji Chaoran(College of Law,Liaoning University,Shenyang Liaoning 110036)
出 处:《沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2018年第4期74-77,共4页Journal of Shenyang Normal University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:辽宁省高级人民法院司法调研课题(LNGFDYKT201719)
摘 要:信访这一具有中国特色的制度,与行政诉讼共同包含有权利救济的功能。但行政诉讼中存在的"过度上访"和"恶意上访"等现象,给法院审判工作造成严重干扰。行政诉讼中当事人更愿意选择上访,主要有基于实用主义的考量、司法公信力不足和基于对行政诉讼对抗性的反感等原因。法院应对信访困境,应当采取提高司法公信力、改进现有审判方式、建立信访终极机制等措施。The system of letters and visits with Chinese characteristics has the function of right relief as well as administrative litigation.However,the"excessive petition"and"malicious petition"in the administrative litigation have caused serious interference to the court trial work.In the administrative litigation,the litigants are more willing to choose the petition which mainly based on the consideration of pragmatism,lack of judicial credibility and the antipathy to the resistance of administrative litigation and other reasons.In response to the petition dilemma,the court should adopt measures such as improving judicial credibility,improving existing trial mode and establishing the ultimate mechanism for letters and visits.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222