基于平等原则合理分析《人体损伤程度鉴定标准》中创口与瘢痕长度的规定  

Rationality Analysis on the Length of Wound and Scar in The Identification Standards of Injury Degree of Human Body under Equality Principle

作　　者：王有民[1] Wang Youmin

机构地区：[1]陕西警官职业学院信息技术系

出　　处：《医学与法学》2018年第3期60-64,共5页Medicine and Jurisprudence

摘　　要：《人体损伤程度鉴定标准》中有关创口和瘢痕长度的同一性规定,忽视了创口与瘢痕的发生发展与变化规律,其在司法实务中仅实现了形式平等,却忽视了实质平等,合理性存疑;且相关规定不但给损伤状态、鉴定时机的选择及重新鉴定带来随机性和不确定性,对于临界性损伤还易致鉴定意见不同,继而影响鉴定的公平性,导致司法不公。文章提出应遵循平等原则,完善相关规定,做到损伤状态统一、数值规定统一、鉴定意见统一,以最大程度实现《标准》形式平等与实质平等双重维度的统一。In The Identification Standards of Injury Degree of Human Body,the identity regulations about the length of wound and scar ignored the occurrence,development,and change regulation of the wound and scar.It only achieved formal equality but not substantive equality in judicial practice,and brings some doubts about its rationality.Because of these regulations,there is randomness and uncertainty in the choice of damage status,identification time,and re-identification.At the same time,it can bring different expert opinion for critical damage,affect the fairness of the identification and create judicial injustice.In order to achieve the unity of formal equality and substantive equality as much as possible,it is suggested in this paper that we should improve the relevant provisions according to the principle of equality,and realize the unity of the damage status,numerical specification and expert opinions.

关 键 词：平等原则 创口 瘢痕 长度 同一性 合理性 

分 类 号：D919.4[医药卫生—法医学]