历史叙事的多重视野:刘邦与项羽引论——兼论“互见法”的历史哲学内涵  

An Introduction of Liu Bang and Xiang Yu Based on Multiple Perspectives of Historical Narration and the Historical Philosophy of Co-reference

作　　者：高军强[1] GAO Jun-qiang(School of Humanities, Weinan Normal University, Weinan 714099, China)

机构地区：[1]渭南师范学院人文学院,陕西渭南714099

出　　处：《渭南师范学院学报》2018年第13期68-73,共6页Journal of Weinan Normal University

基　　金：国家社科基金项目:<史记>选本研究(11XZW005)

摘　　要：作为历史人物的刘邦和项羽的研究在整体上具有意图阐释的特点,其结果是历史人物庸人化。要克服这种状况需要以《史记》历史叙事的复杂性作为研究的出发点。《史记》提供了刘邦和项羽叙事的四种类型,即亵渎之词、情节化叙事、编年叙事和非文本叙事,它暗示出"互见法"与《春秋》"异辞"之间的联系和表现形态。《史记》叙事的多重视野意味着历史进入个体存在被发现的时代,这个时代需要建构新的历史哲学。The study of Liu Bang and Xiang Yu is characterized of interpretation. As a result,although Liu Bang and Xiang Yu are historical figures,their images are vulgarized and superficialized. To change this situation,the starting point of research should be focused on the historically narrative complexity of Historical Records. As far as Liu Bang and Xiang Yu are concerned,Historical Records provides us with four kinds of narrative： the words of blasphemy,plotting narrative,chronological narrative and non-text narrative. That implies the relationship between＂the co-reference＂and＂Yici＂in The Spring and Autumn Annals. The multiple vision narrative used in Historical Records means that history has entered the age of highlighting individual existence and this era needs to construct a new philosophy of history.

关 键 词：刘邦 项羽 互见法 《史记》叙事 

分 类 号：K207[历史地理—历史学]