检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李牧今 LI Mu-jin(Peking University,Beijing 100871,China)
机构地区:[1]北京大学,北京100871
出 处:《云南大学学报(社会科学版)》2018年第4期31-36,共6页The Journal of Yunnan University:Social Sciences Edition
摘 要:康德的革命权思想是其法哲学思想的重要组成部分,且与其国家理论和社会契约理论紧密相连。为了更加准确全面地把握这一思想,本文首先从洛克等人的社会契约观及其革命权思想入手,再与康德的相应论述进行对比,从康德的实践理性原则出发,得出康德先验唯心论框架中的革命权思想,从中我们既可以看到康德的革命观与其整个实践哲学思想环环相扣,融贯自洽,也能从一个新的角度理解社会契约理论和以此为基础的革命权思想。Kant' s theory of the right to revolution is an important part of his legal philosophy,and is closely connected with his theories of the state and social contract. In order to grasp his thought more accurately and comprehensively,this article begins with the ideas of social contract and revolution rights proposed by Locke and others,and compares it with the corresponding expositions from Kant. Starting from Kant' s principle of practical reason and drawing Kant' s right to revolution in his framework of transcendental idealism,we can see that Kant' s idea of right to revolution and its whole practical philosophy are coherent and self-consistent,which offers us a different understanding of social contract and right to revolution on this basis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229