试论中国古代“良史”观的发展  

On the Development of Ancient Chinese “Good Historian” Idea

作　　者：胡楚清 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学历史学院

出　　处：《历史教学问题》2018年第4期39-43,138,共5页History Research And Teaching

摘　　要：“良史”是中国古代史学上经常提到的一个概念，历代学人关于“良史”的评论涉及史官以及史家的历史记载、历史撰述、历史评论和个人品德。综而观之，这也可以看作是“良史”观的种种表现。而“良史”观的发展经历了从对个体“良史”的具体评论到对史家群体的综合表述，再到从主客体的统一协调看待“良史”的发展过程。考察这一发展过程，可以全面地认识中国史学的面貌。"Good Historian"?was frequently mentioned in ancient Chinese historiography. The standards on a"good historian"included his historical record, historical writing, historical comments and personal morality. And the expression of "good historian"had three phases. The first phase was of the specific evaluation of the individual "good historian". The second phase was of the comprehensive description of the historian group,and the third phase was to judge a "good historian"from his subjective and objective unity. The study of this development process can help us fully understand the Chinese historiography.

关 键 词：良史 演变 主客体关系 发展 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]