论不得强迫自证其罪原则——兼议2012年《刑事诉讼法》第50条之规定  

The Principle Against Self-incrimination——with a Discussion of the Fiftieth Article of the Criminal Procedure Law of 2012

作　　者：陶文婷 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《汕头大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2018年第8期73-80,共8页Journal of Shantou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：我国于2012年将不得强迫自证其罪原则的精神引入《刑事诉讼法》中,然而法条定位失准、措辞表述不当、存在冲突规定的尴尬现状表明,不得强迫自证其罪原则在我国更多地带有口号色彩。究其原因,有三个层面的因素:首先,我国长期以来推行的"坦白从宽、抗拒从严"刑事政策在一定程度上加剧了有罪推定的错误理念;其次,在现行"流水作业式"诉讼构造中,其暗含的镇压色彩使得犯罪追诉方拥有了被追诉者难以企及的地位优势;最后,潜藏的国家主义哲学价值深刻影响着司法者与普通民众,它凭借观念上的力量对不得强迫自证其罪原则的确立造成了根本性障碍。As the cornerstone of adversary lawsuit system, the principle against self-incrimination ascertains the main role played by suspects and defendants in lawsuits. China has introduced the principle against self-incrimination into the Criminal Procedure Law in 2012. However, incorrect positioning, misuses of words and existence of contradictory clause mean the principle is still nominal. This phenomenon roots in three factors:firstly, the policy of "leniency for those who confess; severity for those who resist"results in the formation of the presumption of guilt; secondly, due to the lawsuit structure like"flow line", public prosecutor wins dominance in criminal procedure, thirdly, ancient China's authoritarianism becomes a fundamental impediment to the establishment of the principle.

关 键 词：不得强迫自证其罪 沉默权 自白任意性规则 如实陈述义务 

分 类 号：DF71[政治法律—诉讼法学]