检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蔡全保 CAI Quan-bao(Department of Internal Medicine,Guangzhou Huangpu District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou 510700,China)
出 处:《中国实用医药》2018年第22期11-13,共3页China Practical Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨泮托拉唑治疗消化性溃疡合并出血的临床效果。方法 60例消化性溃疡合并出血患者,采用双色球分组法分成对照组和观察组,各30例。在常规治疗基础上,对照组采用奥美拉唑治疗,观察组则采用泮托拉唑治疗。比较两组症状改善情况、疼痛强度、成功止血时间、住院天数及药物不良反应发生情况。结果治疗前两组患者黑便次数、呕血次数及出血量比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗3 d后,观察组黑便次数(0.23±0.14)次/d、呕血次数(0.32±0.10)次/d、出血量(12.62±2.01)ml/d少于对照组的(1.15±0.10)次/d、(1.21±0.15)次/d、(24.52±3.36)ml/d,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前两组疼痛得分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗2、5 d后,观察组疼痛得分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组成功止血时间、住院天数短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组药物不良反应发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论奥美拉唑、泮托拉唑对消化性溃疡合并出血有一定的治疗效果,但是泮托拉唑的疗效和安全性更高,值得采用。Objective To investigate the clinical effect of Pantoprazole in the treatment of peptic ulcer complicated with hemorrhage. Methods A total of 60 peptic ulcer patients complicated with hemorrhage were divided into control group and observation group by double color ball grouping method, 30 cases in each group. On the basis of conventional therapy, the control group received Omeprazole for treatment, and the observation group received Pantoprazole for treatment. The symptom improvement, pain intensity, successful hemostasis time, length of stay and adverse drug reactions between the two groups were compared. Results Before treatment, there were no statistically significant differences in the number of black stools, number of hematemesis and bleeding volume between the two groups(P0.05). After 3 d of treatment, the number of black stools, number of hematemesis and bleeding volume in the observation group were(0.23±0.14) times/d,(0.32±0.10) times/d and(12.62±2.01) ml/d respectively, which were significantly less than(1.15±0.10) times/d,(1.21±0.15) times/d and(24.52±3.36) ml/d in the control group, the differences were statistically significant(P0.05). Before treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in the pain score between the two groups(P0.05). After 2 and 5 d of treatment, the pain scores of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group, the differences were statistically significant(P0.05). The successful hemostasis time and length of stay in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group, the differences were statistically significant(P0.05). The incidence of adverse drug reactions in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P0.05). Conclusion Omeprazole and Pantoprazole show certain effects in the treatment of peptic ulcer complicated with hemorrhage, but Pantoprazole is more effective and sa
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117