抗战文学审美批评的路向、困境与转型  

Orientations,Difficulties and Transformation of the Aesthetic Criticism in Anti-Japanese War Literature

作　　者：吴翔宇[1] WU Xiangyu(College of Humanities,Zhejiang Normal University,Jinhua,Zhejiartg 321004)

机构地区：[1]浙江师范大学人文学院,浙江金华321004

出　　处：《中国文学研究》2018年第3期8-16,共9页Research of Chinese Literature

基　　金：国家社会科学基金后期资助项目"鲁迅小说的中国形象研究"(15FZW058);教育部人文社科研究青年基金项目"20世纪中国文化语境下的‘鲁迅形象’研究"(13YJC751062);浙江省高校重大人文社科攻关项目"沈从文小说的民族国家想象研究"(2016QN026)

摘　　要：政治对文学的介入,对文学批评的影响是深远的。抗战时期,作家在创作方法上的现实主义,文化观念上的政治倾向性,成为当时特定的社会政治环境中主导性的批评路向。对政治显效性的偏重,使文学批评难以整饬"思想性"与"艺术性"、"普及"与"提高"之间的矛盾,审美批评遭受困境。走出这种困局的路径是将审美批评置于文学与政治的张力结构中,用"非同一性"的辩证思维审视两者的深层关联,不断纠正非理性的批评倾向,在论争中逐渐走向深化。Political involvement in literature made a profound impact on literary criticism. The creative methods of realism and the political orientation on cultural values that writers applied during Anti-Japanese War became a dominant literary orientation in the par- ticular social and political environment. Markedly emphasis on politics made literary criticism difficult to straighten out the contradiction between ＂ideology＂ and ＂art＂, ＂popularization＂ and ＂improvement＂. Aesthetic criticism suffered difficulties. The path for getting out of this dilemma is to place the aesthetic criticism in the tensile structure of the literature and polities, with the ＂non-identity＂ dialectical thinking looking at the deep association between the two, constantly colTecting the tendency of non-rational criticism, and deepening gradually in the debate.

关 键 词：抗战文学 审美批评 困境 出路 

分 类 号：I01[文学—文学理论]