范文澜注“张衡怨篇”句辨析  

Analysis of Fan Wenlan's Annotations to “Zhang Heng Yuan Pian”

作　　者：李平[1] LI Ping(School of Literature,Anhui Normal University,Wuhu,Anhui 241000,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽师范大学文学院,安徽芜湖241000

出　　处：《井冈山大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第3期100-104,共5页Journal of Jinggangshan University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"海峡两岸‘龙学’比较研究"(项目编号:15BZW040)

摘　　要：范文澜注《文心雕龙·明诗》"张衡怨篇,清典可味;仙诗缓歌,雅有新声",不仅存在字讹序倒、人名错标、卷次淆乱诸多讹失,而且将黄注、纪评、李补和黄札裒辑于一体,统统置于李详名下,既有乖其书著述体例,又致使阅者错识颜标,还导致注文仰逼俯侵。故须辨析其讹误与错失,使黄注、纪评、李补与黄札各归其所。而在辨析过程中,还可以依据此条注文所透露的信息,判断"范注"所据底本为扫叶山房石印本《文心雕龙辑注》。Fan Wenlan＇ s annotations related to ＂Zhang Heng Yuan Pian, Qing Dian Ke Wei; Xian Shi Huan Ge, Ya You Xin Sheng＂ （Zhang Heng＇ s poem of complaint is classic and gracious; his other two poems Xian Shi and Huan Ge are sublime＂ in Wen Xin Diao Long-Ming Shi （＂On Poetry＂ in A System of Literary Criteria） are not correct in characters, names, editions, etc. For, example, Mr. Fan misunderstands Huang＇ s annotations, Ji＇ s comments, Li＇ s supplements and Huang＇ s notes as what Li Xiang made so that readers would be misled. Therefore, it＇ s necessary to point out such kind of mistakes. Through analysis of the annotations, it＇ s found out that Fan＇ s annotations are based on Wen Xin Diao Long Ji Zhu （ A System of Literary Criteria with Annotations） copied by Shaoyeshanfang publisher.

关 键 词：范文澜 《文心雕龙注》 《明诗》 《文心雕龙辑注》 辨析 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]